SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > Silent Hunter III
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-20-22, 03:46 PM   #1
kyle9154
Commander
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia THE HUB OF ALL CONVOYS
Posts: 461
Downloads: 368
Uploads: 0
Default

Don't know if it was mentioned or not but there was also the so called 'Piening Route' - https://uboat.net/maps/piening-route...orial%20waters).
__________________
U-Boote sind die Wölfe auf See...Angreifen...Reißen...Sinken!!! U-boats are the wolves at sea...Attack...Tear...Sink!!! - Karl Doenitz

Admin for the Onealex Mod Discord - https://discord.gg/bKCdQekE4W

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tSpRvfqFYp0&t
kyle9154 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-22, 10:02 PM   #2
Bubblehead1980
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Florida USA
Posts: 6,922
Downloads: 550
Uploads: 42


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kyle9154 View Post
Don't know if it was mentioned or not but there was also the so called 'Piening Route' - https://uboat.net/maps/piening-route...orial%20waters).

I was not aware of this but makes sense. Thank you for sharing.
Bubblehead1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-22, 10:03 PM   #3
Bubblehead1980
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Florida USA
Posts: 6,922
Downloads: 550
Uploads: 42


Default

Thanks for all the responses.
Bubblehead1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-22, 11:40 PM   #4
Bubblehead1980
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Florida USA
Posts: 6,922
Downloads: 550
Uploads: 42


Default

What are appropriate dates for U boats to get surface search radar . FuMO 21 FuMO 23? My understanding is U boats did not have air search radar for most of the war? One reason aircraft were such a threat to U Boats vs subs in pacific is U boats lacked air search radar for most of the war, vs US had air search radar from the start.
Bubblehead1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-22, 01:27 AM   #5
Aktungbby
Gefallen Engel U-666
 
Aktungbby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: On a tilted, overheated, overpopulated spinning mudball on Collision course with Andromeda Galaxy
Posts: 27,930
Downloads: 22
Uploads: 0


Default

http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNGER_Radar.php
Quote:
The first radar employed on U-boats was a submarine version of the standard German Seetakt (entered svc 1942)(82cm wavelength, 386 megacycles). The FuMO 29 set had a 2x6 fixed dipole array fitted on the forward face of the conning tower Known as Funkmessortungsgerat (radar detention apparatus) and abbreviated to FuMO, this set was also referred to as GEMA, after the manufacturer that produced it. It was installed beginning in 1942 in a few Type VIIs and IXs. This set had a very narrow detection coverage of 10 degrees on each side of the bow, which meant that the U-boat had to make an almost complete circle to cover a 360 degree sweep. The range was 7,500 meters against surface vessels and 15,000 meters against aircraft. while FuMO 30 (entered service 1943)had a small turnable frame aerial with only 2x4 dipoles. Results with these sets were unsatisfactory but the Luftwaffe which held more advanced views on radar than the Navy and was now the leading service in this field, had a better type, the FuMG 200 Hohentwiel (56cm wavelength, 556 megacycles). This set became the FuMO 61 Hohentwiel-U which employed a rectangular frame aerial (1m x 1,4m) carrying 4x6 dipoles.
As with my reference to the "wizard war" (above posts)
Quote:
Although German radar development was very promising in its early stages it was quickly overtaken by allied technology. One major reason for this was that the German Navy, which was the most conservative of the three services, did not realize the full potential of active radar, leaving the Allies in a favorable position to force the pace of the microwave war. The German Navy had decided that radar transmissions would provide a source from which an enemy could obtain a 'fix' on a ship's position, in the same way that direction-finders could be used to obtain a 'fix' on the source of a radio transmission. Extensive use of radar was therefore discouraged, a decision reinforced by the German belief in the superiority of their optical equipment. It is significant that young officers were taught absolutely nothing about radar and had to learn from scratch about the complex microwave war while on active service, in conditions where any fault could be fatal. It was not until March 1945 that German Naval Command issued Tactical order No 10 entitled Instruction for use of radar aboard surface units.
Thus the story of German naval radar in surface units is one of 'too lates'.
http://www.uboataces.com/radar.shtml
__________________

"Only two things are infinite; The Universe and human squirrelyness; and I'm not too sure about the Universe"
Aktungbby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-22, 04:35 AM   #6
Bubblehead1980
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Florida USA
Posts: 6,922
Downloads: 550
Uploads: 42


Default

How many nautical miles were U boats in a patrol lined spaced apart? . 15-20 ?
Bubblehead1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-22, 05:03 AM   #7
Kapitän
The Old Man
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Posts: 1,580
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubblehead1980 View Post
How many nautical miles were U boats in a patrol lined spaced apart? . 15-20 ?

Maximum range of sight for the bridge watch was about 30sm; If I recall correctly, the space between boats in a patrol line was about 50-60sm.
__________________
KSDII-Ace/GWX 3.0 Gold/CCoM 10.0 + h.sie-patch; Windows 7 (64-bit); NVIDIA GeForce GTX650 (310.90)
Kapitän is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2024 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.