SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
07-27-22, 05:33 AM | #1 | |
Admiral
|
Quote:
The part, in Magenta, was after a thought & conversation on... looking into the idea, of putting SH3... (& quite possibly, 4, at the least... not sure if 5 would bene... not to say it couldn't... ) on a diet, to lower the 3D count on ships... which seems to be the biggest area (as I understand it... I admit, that 3D rendering, is NOT My strong suite... by far. ) of contention... where it pertains to load time. The idea & concept of that... original thought idea, was... to have ships not be so, load intensive, so as to be able to better be able to include things that were.... not quite right, with things like land areas, not being in where they should be, ports... being more... correct in not just placement, but... be a bit more... active. At least, that was the basis for it... to make the game better. I guess, like Icarus, I guess my idea, flew too close to the sun. *sigh* Ahh well. M. M.
__________________
|
|
07-27-22, 09:15 AM | #2 | |
Grey Wolf
|
Quote:
You're right, I remember now. I'm sharing your point of view. It's not a problem for me to have low-poly ships (or aircrafts) if they are historically correct and with nice textures... |
|
|
|