SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-14-09, 05:20 AM | #31 | |
Commander
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: St.Petersburg, Russia
Posts: 474
Downloads: 166
Uploads: 0
|
Quote:
The area of South-China sea is disputed by several nations.
Spratly islands map showing occupied features marked with the flags of countries occupying them. Philippines Taiwan/ROC Vietnam Malaysia China/PRC http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spratly_Islands It is not a problem for international shipping and air lines, since they are established by international agreements and have international status even in territorial whaters. The problem is with US which doesn't respect Parcels, Spratlys ets as islands, as islands owned by People's Republic of China and the other, neither UN approved international agreements launching provocative missions in zones other nations assume their own. Actualy what we see is the begging of competition between China and US for influence zones in Pacific region which will boost in this century. Last edited by Hunter; 03-14-09 at 05:35 AM. |
|
03-14-09, 06:16 AM | #32 |
Grey Wolf
Join Date: May 2007
Location: 11SMS 98896 10565
Posts: 756
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
Ah, the Spratly Island Group, has reared it's ugly head yet again.
However, these islands are far to the south of the events where the USNS Impeccable and Victorious were harassed, and followed. Those Islands have been in dispute, in some cases well before WWII, between the different legal entities in the region. Some of the Nations claim only part of the island group, while others make claims on it in its entirety. Last I had read on it, there was a moritorium on making active claims, and that they were going to use ASEAN as the forum which to work out the disagreements. Either way. There are disputing claims, all questionable to the others concerned parties, and the US has only stated that they hope that it comes to a peaceful conclusion without siding with any particular countries claims. Therefore, you are right to some extent, that the US doesn't recognize anyones claims on any particular island, so it can remain politically neutral in the matter. Like I said, the events regarding the two US flagged vessels in International Waters, is unconnected to the PRCs (and other countries) claims to the Spratly and Parcel Island Groups. Even if we are talking about EEZs, an EEZ is an are of extended regulation of vessel in regards to the exploitation of the marine fisheries and materials that originate from the seabed underneath it, and doesn't stop foreign flagged vessels from sailing within it when they aren't doing either of the two mentioned. Imagine if that was the case where EEZs were treated as Territorial Waters; that would be rediculous, and laughable at face value. By the way, there is a Harpoon Scenario that pits the 1990s PLAN against the other regional nation's navies in a combined force over the PRC forcing its claim by armed annexation. It's interesting as you have to manuever around those small islands, there is very little aircraft involved, and the largest size vessel of any significant combat capability is in the size of a frigate. So lets not bring up matters in the region that are completely unrelated.
__________________
"The Federation needs men like you, doctor. Men of conscience. Men of principle. Men who can sleep at night... You're also the reason Section Thirty-one exists -- someone has to protect men like you from a universe that doesn't share your sense of right and wrong." -Sloan, Section Thirty-One Last edited by JALU3; 03-14-09 at 06:39 AM. |
03-14-09, 04:59 PM | #33 | |
Commander
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: St.Petersburg, Russia
Posts: 474
Downloads: 166
Uploads: 0
|
Quote:
I posted this map just to illustrate that PRC reaction isn't connected to territorial waters rater than EZZ. But it isn't very important too since China uses this claim just to formalaze reason to keep USN aways from Hainan base and nearby testing area, one shouldn't consider this reaction as just result of penetration in EZZ. But as I have posted above, I suppose the event is much more connected to 2 PLCN SSBNs rather than location. And I called USNS Impeccable mission provocative not because it violates something but just because such reaction on such mission and such area could be well expected in advance. Last edited by Hunter; 03-14-09 at 05:26 PM. |
|
03-15-09, 02:45 AM | #34 |
Grey Wolf
Join Date: May 2007
Location: 11SMS 98896 10565
Posts: 756
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
Map from maps.google.com of the area.
When I first read about this event, I read that the event occured roughly 75 miles from Hainan Island, which would have placed the events of the USNS Impeccable and USNS Victorious somewhere between Hainan Island and the Paracel Islands (which I mispelled earlier). I think we can all agree that this in no way is connected to their actual recognized territorial water limit, but more so is related to their view of what control an EEZ allows them, which appears to be far greater than internationally accepted norms. However, what the PLAN needs to understand is that international waters, are just that, not owned or controlled by any specific nation-state. And if they want to test their SSBNs, like any other nation that has them, that means that other vessels will be out their to listen (and as other's have said, they are pretty sure it happens all the time). Following at a distance, buzzing is one thing, directly interfering with the safe navigation of another in international waters is a completely different story all together. Futhermore, even if PRC were to claim that the vessel were violating its EEZ by exploiting the fisheries or mineral wealth within it, the five vessels, that the USN released pictures of did not clearly show that they were of any authoritiy by which to make an inspection. Rather they appeared to be PRC flagged merchant vessels, actively engaging in navigation disruption of a US flagged Government vessel. Of course depending on your news source, some say they were PLAN vessels, while other only claim that they are PRC flagged vessels without being specific to being connected to the government or not of said nation-state. Full Sized image of one of the vessels interfering with the USNS Impeccable. Note that it wasn't flying a customs ensign, which some claim its usage has been discontinued. Even if they were customs vessels, I don't believe that the action shown in that picture can been seen as legitimate.
__________________
"The Federation needs men like you, doctor. Men of conscience. Men of principle. Men who can sleep at night... You're also the reason Section Thirty-one exists -- someone has to protect men like you from a universe that doesn't share your sense of right and wrong." -Sloan, Section Thirty-One |
03-16-09, 02:46 AM | #35 | |
Commander
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: St.Petersburg, Russia
Posts: 474
Downloads: 166
Uploads: 0
|
Quote:
Last edited by Hunter; 03-16-09 at 03:33 AM. |
|
03-16-09, 04:32 AM | #36 |
Grey Wolf
Join Date: May 2007
Location: 11SMS 98896 10565
Posts: 756
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
Please don't misunderstand me. I completely see why PRC doesn't like US Flagged Government owned and US Navy vessels in international waters within their non-disputed EEZ. There is very little question as to why the vessel was there, or what it was doing. However, it is the case, that this occurs to US vessels during testings with foreign flagged vessels within the US EEZs doing the same thing, gathering intel. The US recognizes though that it cannot stop it, because of international laws and customs, so doesn't try (that is unless you believe the conspiracy theories saying that that unfortunate accident with that Japanese training ship was not an accident).
Imagine though if the US were to act the way that the PRC acted towards the USNS Impeccable, and used the EEZ arguement that the PRC is doing. There would be cries from the international community that would be so much louder against the US, then the near silence from the international community regading the PRCs actions. In fact, during the cold war, it is my understanding that it was very common for foreign flagged vessels to be within the US EEZ for the specific purpose of listening in on US movements, as well as to tail any USN task forces that did leave port.
__________________
"The Federation needs men like you, doctor. Men of conscience. Men of principle. Men who can sleep at night... You're also the reason Section Thirty-one exists -- someone has to protect men like you from a universe that doesn't share your sense of right and wrong." -Sloan, Section Thirty-One |
03-16-09, 08:32 AM | #37 | ||
Commander
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: St.Petersburg, Russia
Posts: 474
Downloads: 166
Uploads: 0
|
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Hunter; 03-16-09 at 12:51 PM. |
||
|
|