Wuhan virus 2020

[Jimbuna]

[Jimbuna]

[Jimbuna]

[Jimbuna]

[Skybird]

New American mRNA vaccine:

https://ir.arcturusrx.com/news-relea...9-mrna-vaccine

Small but not unimportant differences to those of Biontech/Pfizer, and Moderna.

[Skybird]

Supplementing the supplement.

"It would seem to me as though one potential treatment for Covid-19 would be to get some outside exposure." (00:19:50)


Not just vitamine D from UVB, but also intracellular Melatonin from NIR.

Not a paradoxon. Just a requirement of deeper understanding.




I would add, since he mentions the importance of the mitochondria, that its not just about the mitochondria producing intracellular melatonin (almost 20 times as much as the pineal gland!), but also mitochondria producing ATP, the cell's gasoline that drives the body's "economy". Thats why I also prioritize a robust supply with coencyme Q10, it boosts the ATP production. You do not want to be short on ATP, a shortage has a general systemic effect that is not serving for your good. ATP gets consumed as fast as it gets produced, you produce around your body's weight per day in ATP. Since ATP gets produced on demand and does not get stored in significant quantities but gets instantly consumed, you probably do not benefit from trying to boost your ATP production beysond the normal/needed level, maybe that is not even possible, I don't know. But you very likely benefit from making sure your mitochondria are always able to produce the ammount of ATP that is in demand at any given time, and this you can help by taking Q10 in relevant doses. I take 400mg, which is considered a very solid dose. Good quality Q10 is expensive, thats the bad news. There are two forms, an oxidated form (Ubiquinon, cheaper), and an activated form (ubinquinol, by the Japanese company Kaneka, much more expensive). Ubiquinol has a much better bio-availability, the factors found in various studies varied between 3 and 8! The rpice diference is tmepting, but always choose Ubiquinol over Ubiquinon. The bang for the buck ratio is better. If you also supplement Vitamine E isomeres like gamma or delta tocotrienole (do yourself a favour and avoid alpha tocopherole), then have one or two hours delay between the two, do not coinsume them together,m they neutrelais each other, but both are - beside a good omega-3 oil - amonst the most expensive vitamine and mineral supplements you can take. Dont waste your money.



And do not forget that supplements are not called supplements for no reason. They are no replacements, but additions! Eat good stuff. Get exposure time outside. Avoid bad food. Pills and drops are a supplement to all that - not a replacement, not a surrogate!

[Jimbuna]

[Jimbuna]

[Jimbuna]

[Skybird]

In the movies: Masks on a plane!




A no brainer, imho, but the added methodological broadside may help the one or the other sceptic to come around.


Personally, over here I look inside a shop or supermarket whether there are few or many people inside, and depending on what I see I use a mask or not. Means: I do not wear a mask in EVERY shop situation anymore. Small shop: mask; big shop: not always. Many people: mask; few people: maybe no mask. No air ventilation: always a mask.

[Jimbuna]

Pretty much how I see it

[Jimbuna]

[Jimbuna]

[Skybird]

Difficult matter, the background is so complex that even normal doctors will not fully understand it, only highly specialised research experts.

As I said some weeks ago, the whole vaccination starts to smell rotten to me, since vaccine producers now have had enogz time to compelte the demanded data for licensing and permitting the vaccines, and havent done so, and Biontech was sued in Germany for handing out internal data and evaluations of the vaccines, which they did - but were not hindered to delete/hide several statistical key variables without which certain critical assessments and statistical evaluations cannot be done. It was then when my lights finally started to spring to red. There is something rotten in this state, and I think its stinks big time.

In Germany, the states silently withdrew last surviving anti-corona measurements without making a big show of it. I cannot escape the impression somebody tries to sneak away and not getting cought. Severla former key names in the dosucssions suddenly have disappeared from media presence. The minister of health is being accused of having lied and preventing a neutral evaluation of the anti corona measurements' effectiveness.

That we get more and more scientific reports now that suddenly cast shadows were before, for two years, they declared only light, does not make it any better.

For the record, myself , being vaccinated three times with mRNA (2x Biontech, 1x Moderna), I cannot report any symptomns, side effects, or negatives. But my father got completely knocked down by the second jab and was hospitalized for one day and night. My Mum felt nothing after her second.

Achse des Guten had this text some days ago (and I give the link to the German original because it has many links in its text):

https://www.achgut.com/artikel/mrna_...erden_sichtbar

mRNA vaccines: The disastrous consequences are becoming visible

By Andreas Zimmermann.

The so-called "corona vaccinations" are very likely the biggest scandal in medical history. It is a failure of civilization, unprecedented at least in quantitative terms.

The human organism is a complex system that we can describe only partially and approximately. Therefore, biological models and in vitro experiments or animal experiments always have limited explanatory power. Ultimately, human trials are always needed to study medical therapeutic interventions and to understand their efficacy and adverse effects. These trials are called clinical trials. However, no adequate trials were conducted prior to the emergency approval and marketing of the SARS-CoV-2 "vaccines."

This is because no adequate, double-blind, prospective, randomized trials comparing vaccination against placebo over the long term have been conducted. The pivotal studies submitted to the competent authorities (FDA, EMA, etc.) used inappropriate endpoints, were unblinded after only a few months, and did not adequately investigate safety. It was already an expression of total regulatory failure that these studies were accepted by the competent authorities. As a result, we have no reliable data on the efficacy and toxicity of the SARS-CoV-2 "vaccines."

Instead of investigating an effect of the vaccines on all-cause mortality or all-cause morbidity of the subjects, only an effect on influenza symptoms when the PCR test was positive was investigated. The minor effect thus shown is clinically irrelevant, as can be seen from the fact that vaccinated subjects are at least as likely to transmit the virus as unvaccinated subjects. On the other hand, if we retrospectively examine all-cause mortality, we find that vaccinated individuals fare significantly worse than unvaccinated individuals: among vaccinated individuals, mortality is significantly higher than among unvaccinated individuals, and vaccination harms them. The mRNA vaccines do not protect against severe illness from COVID or death from COVID (viral pneumonia); rather, they increase mortality compared to the unvaccinated. What are the causes of this?

After vaccination, the lipid nanoparticles containing the artificial mRNA are taken up into cells of the body by endocytosis. In the cells, the mRNA is then released from the lipid coat in endosomes and transported to the endoplasmic reticulum, where it is translated into SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. The mRNA itself, but more importantly the protein, then exert numerous immunogenic and toxic effects in and damage the cells of the organism.
Vaccines highly toxic

A review essay just published after successful peer review (review by scientific peers, though the process is not without problems) by Seneff, Nigh, Kyriakopoulos, and McCullough, who work at the prestigious MIT (Cambridge, Massachusetts), the Truth for Health Foundation (Tuscon, Arizona), and at two private biotech companies, presents a careful and factual account of the toxicity of Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna mRNA vaccines directed against SARS-CoV-2. The paper is a review (presentation of the research of others) and not an original work. The authors take a very cautious approach, first acknowledging that a causal link between vaccination and death or serious illness has only been established for a few suspected vaccine harms. However, they also emphasize that such a link could only be ruled out in a tiny fraction of cases.

Their conclusion is that the mRNA vaccines are highly toxic and billions of vaccinees are at risk of severe health damage from the intervention, particularly severe cardiovascular disease, coagulation system disease, brain disease, cancer, and chronic infectious disease. The risk is proportional to the frequency of injection, the more boosters, the worse. To prove this, they take a two-step approach.

First, they work through some important cell biology pathogenetic mechanisms of vaccines under investigation and lay out the evidence available for these mechanisms. Then, in light of these insights, they address vaccine adverse event reports from the CDC's (the U.S. Centers for Disease Control) VAERS system. This system collects reports of suspected toxic effects of vaccination, but without proving a causal relationship. Here, the second step is crucial, as we can read from the CDC data some of the impact of the largest human experiment in human history - without these data, the first part of the paper would be purely interpretive or speculative.

The overall quality of the research article is decent. The main weakness of the article is the structuring, since from the ninth paragraph on the systematic of the presentation is not well maintained. But this does not harm the quality of the statements. Nowhere does the article attempt to make claims that have not already been proven. Hypotheses are clearly marked as such.
What are the results?

Cell Biology:

In the cell biology part of the paper, the authors address the following mechanisms: Suppression of interferon synthesis in infections, properties of artificial RNA used in vaccines, exosome formation and axonal transport to the brain, suppression of DNA repair, disruption of cellular immunity, disruption of the coagulation cascade, disruption of sulfatide synthesis in the liver, cleavage of the S1 fragment of the spike protein with binding and ACE2 receptor.

Understanding these connections requires a broad and deep medical and cell biology education, which the international medical community does not have, but which only a few tens of thousands of academically working physicians and biochemists worldwide have. Therefore, I will pick out only a few aspects here as representatives and try to present them in a generally understandable way.

The authors describe in great detail that vaccinees receiving SARS-CoV-2 mRNA "vaccines" develop a disruption of the interferon alpha-singal system. This system is essential for tumor defense, and when it is disrupted, the likelihood of developing cancer increases significantly. The authors show how inhibition of the interferon-alpha signaling cascade or interferone regulatory factor 9 by "vaccination" can cause disruption of tumor defense and acceleration of tumor growth. Other effects of the "vaccines" mentioned by the authors, such as suppression of DNA repair and disruption of cellular immunity, have additional carcinogenic (cancer-promoting) effects.

Furthermore, the authors also outline how the implantation of the artificial "vaccine" modRNA in the germinal centers of the immune system leads to the formation of spike protein-transporting exosomes for months after vaccination, which can cause inflammatory reactions and vascular and neuronal cell damage throughout the body. Remarkably, the exosomes are transported not only via the lymphatic system and blood vessels, but also via axons of the vagus nerve. The vagus is the longest cranial nerve in the body. It does not originate at the spinal cord like most nerves, but directly at the brain. Due to the axonal transport of the spike protein produced by the vaccination into nerve cells of the vagus, this protein migrates directly into the brain bypassing the blood-brain barrier and can damage or destroy the nerve cells there. Through the furin cleavage site, which is located in the spike protein (and whose presence, which is difficult to explain in evolutionary terms, points to a laboratory origin of the virus), exosomal spike protein can be cleaved by furin, an enzyme located outside the cells in the intracellular space, thereby releasing the spike S1 fragment. This, the authors show, can penetrate the blood-brain barrier, which is designed to protect the brain from toxic proteins and other macromolecules in the blood, and also exert its toxic effects in the brain.

In great detail, the authors outline how the artificial GC-rich "vaccine" modRNA can disrupt cell metabolism and translation regulation by forming pathological RNA structures and affect DNA repair or cell cycle control.

Overall, numerous highly complex mechanisms are responsible for the extraordinary toxicity of the spike protein, which is distributed throughout the body by vaccination, whereas it does not enter the bloodstream in clinically relevant quantities during normal SARS-CoV-2 infection. We only insufficiently understand the interaction and overall effect of the "vaccination", but we can see from the clinic of the "vaccinated" that it is undoubtedly a harmful substance that has been repeatedly injected into billions of people.

Clinic:

Systematically, Seneff and colleagues go through the reports of the VAERS system, which has also been used at Achgut.com since January 2021 as an important source for assessing the toxicity of vaccines. They are aware of the limitations of the system, but they show that neither the few lay entries interfere with the validity of the entries nor have any vaccine opponents abused the system. They also emphasize that the system captures only a fraction of the actual toxic effects of vaccination, so these effects are systematically underreported. The rate of underreporting is a factor of 20 to 50 (only 2 to 5 percent of toxic effects are reported, which is also the case in Germany). The authors take a simple retrospective cohort approach to evaluating the VAERS data, in which they represent, for the toxic effects studied, the proportion of all vaccinations in 2021 caused by SARS-CoV-2 "vaccinations." This approach is simple but compelling because the non-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are essentially rightly considered safe (unlike the modRNA "vaccines," they were clinically studied for 7 to 10 years before approval) and therefore allow a valid blanket control of vaccination events, although the resulting cohorts are certainly different in composition. However, this is clinically irrelevant if the effects are sufficiently strong.

Quantitatively, in the year under consideration, 2021, about one-third of all injections that go under the heading of vaccinations were directed against SARS-CoV-2, so that only one-third of the toxicity reports (so-called "side effects," actually undesirable effects) would also have to refer to this class.

But for the syndrome group of symptoms explained by nerve damage, such as tinnitus, deafness, dizziness, paralysis, or dysphagia, the proportion of SARS-CoV-2 "vaccines" was not 30 but 97 percent (Table 1). For severe heart disease (Table 2) and liver damage (Table 3), it was also 97 percent. For severe coagulation disorders with life-threatening consequences such as sinus vein thrombosis (Table 4), it was just under 99 percent; for neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's or Parkinson's, it was just under 95 percent; and for cancers (Tables 6 and 7), it was 96 to 97 percent - everywhere, only about 30 percent would have been expected with normal vaccine toxicity. For each of the syndrome groups, the authors plausibly demonstrate how the cell biological pathogenetic mechanisms they described in the first part could cause the syndromes. For example, they attribute the large increase in cancer reports to the numerous carcinogenic effects of the modRNA "vaccines" they describe in Part One.

The situation is even more extreme for vaccine deaths. Here, even over a 30-year period, 80 percent of all deaths reported in the system (since 1990) have been related to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. This makes the substances at least 1,000 times more dangerous than conventional vaccines, something we at Achgut have been pointing out since February 2021: You could already quickly see it in the VAERS data.
What follows from this?

None of the currently injected SARS-CoV-2 "vaccines" should ever have been approved, not even by emergency approval. This is because, first, given the low hazard of SARS-CoV-2 to the general population, there was never any danger; even the alpha variant ("Wuhan") was 3 to 5 times less lethal than many influenza strains, such as from 2017/18 (influenza A H3N2 strain), according to WHO. Second, there has never been sufficient evidence for the efficacy and safety of the "vaccines," and now it is certain that they are woefully ineffective for preventing COVID, but very toxic. Billions of people have been potentially harmed in health, namely when they have received an effective dose - because of the immaturity of lipid nanoparticle technology, I estimate that more than half of the doses have severely limited pharmacological efficacy. Therefore, not all vaccinees are equally affected.

If the typical underreporting by a factor of 20 to 50 is taken into account when considering the deaths reported in the various reporting systems, millions have already died worldwide from the consequences of "vaccination," including numerous aborted fetuses due to the "vaccination" of pregnant women. Probably hundreds of millions of people will suffer throughout their lives from the consequences of "vaccination" or have a significantly shortened life expectancy and suffer chronically until their death. It is also conceivable, but not yet proven, that the modRNA "vaccines" reduce fertility and have rendered many young people infertile. We will not be able to fully gauge this putative effect until the next few years; we will be able to see it in a drop in birth rates in countries with high vaccination rates that is far greater than the usual decline.

All in all, the so-called "Corona vaccinations" are very likely the biggest scandal in medical history, and the extent of human suffering caused by an unprecedented collusion of megalomania on the part of the main operators of the "vaccination campaign" and total failure on the part of the leading private and state medical institutions, including the worldwide medical profession, is only beginning to emerge. It is a civilizational failure that, at least in quantitative terms, has never been seen before.
-------------

Another misled hybris like energy turnaround, wanted inflation and planned eocnomy and exploding taxes for energy and and peace without weapons?
I surely has started to look this way. Maybe the early critics were not right at the very beginning, and I think from all we knew two years ago their arguments indeed were not too convicnign at all. But the plots have thickened since then, our knoweldge and experience have grown, and we cannotz escape tpo seriously take into account that some things went terribly wrong there. And not always all by themsleves, but wanted. That the EU uses Corona to push for more digital surveillance of citizens and destruction of privacy and private data security in the positively attributed digital city and national administration environment, does not help to ease the foul taste in the mouth.


The road to hell is paved with good intentions, they say. I would add: a society that is only focussed on its weaknesses and deficits and its weakest members, sooner or later must find it has no strengths and potentials left anymore.



With what I know now, I still would consider getting vaccinated - weighing risk versus gain - but not with mRNA vaccines anymore.


I still consider masks to be a reasionable measurmeent in the accoridng contexts. They filter out droplets and particles, therei s no doubt on that. In an environment where the risk predominantly is from awerosols with much finer "droplets", the value of masks accordingly declines. You see it yourself: when you wear an FFP2 masks, you still can smell cigarette smoke or perfume. Both that are not droplets, but aerosols. So there is no aergument to not use masks, but also no argument to think they make you bullet-proof. Where there are aerosols being the main problem, good ventilation is more relevant.

[Rockstar]

How many of our mandate Nazis are still taking their monthly boosters and popping the new and improved pill? Didn’t you all say it’s the only way to stop the spread of COVID? Don’t you care about people, it’s the only way! Lol. Idiots