SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
04-01-23, 09:51 PM | #1 |
Rear Admiral
|
Or obtain one through an inheritance, have one gifted to you by a family member or just use one that belongs to your mom and dad when you go hunting or to the range. They can also join the military.
I don’t think there is any constitutional guarantee which demands a privately owned company must sell you a firearm.
__________________
Guardian of the honey and nuts Let's assume I'm right, it'll save time. |
04-01-23, 10:48 PM | #2 | |||
Ace of the Deep
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,046
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
|
Quote:
The Supreme Court has ruled that an individuals right to keep and bear arms is a constitutional right. District of Columbia vs. Heller: Quote:
Quote:
Last Year (I think it went into effect in Aug), the Biden Admin implemented the "Frame and receiver rule", that states all frames, and lower receivers must have serial #'s and buyers must pass background check. |
|||
04-02-23, 07:59 AM | #3 | |
Rear Admiral
|
Quote:
My argument was to open the criminal history no matter what stage in life a crime was committed before a purchase. Or raise the age to 21 so there was a record to check. According to you they finally did open minor age records to back ground checks. That’s a good thing imo. The other was Red Flag the use of prescription drugs our ‘professionals’ hand out like candy which has been known for decades to have side effects of increased violent, suicidal, aggressive behavior. Any bets that most shooters were on the stuff when they tripped off line? Any bets the shooter in Nashville who was under care for mental health was taking anti-depressants? If they’re on the stuff they shouldn’t have a gun and dealers shouldn’t sell them one. I’d bet if anyone looked they would find a correlation between the rise in that prescription drug use and the rise in shootings and other violent behavior. What ever the case they need to leave me and other law abiding mentally sound citizens and our firearms out of the argument.
__________________
Guardian of the honey and nuts Let's assume I'm right, it'll save time. Last edited by Rockstar; 04-02-23 at 12:19 PM. |
|
04-02-23, 10:00 AM | #4 | |
Ace of the Deep
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,046
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
|
Quote:
|
|
04-02-23, 10:19 AM | #5 | |
Rear Admiral
|
Quote:
Good point I agree I doubt it’s possible to track them all down anyway. But maybe it’s a good time to start having the information available to firearms dealers. Because who we sell firearms too does matter. I think only 40% of those on prescription drugs have had significant degrees of increased in violent behavior. So not all have problems with it. But all it takes is one goof ball for everyone to get their panties in a bunch. Another idea would be to make the drugs trial data publicly available, so people can make their own educated choices when it comes to taking that stuff. Hold the manufactures and prescribers of those chemicals responsible like they did for the opioid epidemic. The biggest thing for me is for the extremists to leave me and other law abiding, sound minded citizens and our firearms out of the argument.
__________________
Guardian of the honey and nuts Let's assume I'm right, it'll save time. Last edited by Rockstar; 04-02-23 at 12:18 PM. |
|
04-02-23, 12:09 PM | #6 |
Ace of the Deep
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,046
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
|
That information is already publicly available through the National Library of Medicine (est. 1836). That information is also included (albeit in truncated form) every time a prescription is filled.
The problem with this issue, is people are mistaking a symptom (gun violence) for a cause (human behavior), and are trying to eradicate the symptom without addressing the cause. which has never worked, not once, in the last 6000 years of civilization. |
04-02-23, 12:39 PM | #7 | |
Rear Admiral
|
Quote:
I should also add that even though the Second Amendment of the Constitution protects our right to bear arms, ownership is not unconditional. Making mental health information as well as a criminal record available to sellers is maybe one way to reduce sales to nut cases. Look at Australia they didn’t ban firearms, in fact sales are booming. What they did was tighten up the criteria for ownership. Though reduced they have still have from time to time what are considered mass shootings it’s just not something you hear about unless you dig a little. Extremists would lead us to believe all firearms have been banned in Aussie land and mass shootings stopped since ‘96. Honestly I really don’t have the answer how keep nut jobs from owning a firearm.
__________________
Guardian of the honey and nuts Let's assume I'm right, it'll save time. Last edited by Rockstar; 04-02-23 at 12:54 PM. |
|
Tags |
shooter, shooting |
|
|