It was only a matter of time....

DetCord · 07-05-17, 02:39 PM

MadMike · 07-05-17, 03:46 PM

Heh heh.

Care to add SUBROC, ASTOR (or even an ASTOR w/conventional warhead)?

The Soviets had a full range of nuclear depth bombs, torpedoes, ASM's, SSM's, sub and ship launched rockets, atomic demolitions for Naval Spetsnaz, etc.

Yours, Mike

tn_prvteye · 07-05-17, 04:00 PM

Will I still have to fire 10 of them get a mission success?

Steiger · 07-05-17, 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tn_prvteye

Will I still have to fire 10 of them get a mission success?

LOL. I imagine firing 1 would be a mission failure, owing to the whole planetary destruction angle...

caine007 · 07-05-17, 07:07 PM

That hill outside Murmansk is SO dead.

DetCord · 07-06-17, 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tn_prvteye

Will I still have to fire 10 of them get a mission success?

Nah, I altered the damage ratio from 845 to 8500.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steiger

LOL. I imagine firing 1 would be a mission failure, owing to the whole planetary destruction angle...

It'd be a fairly large escalation...

max-peck · 07-06-17, 01:18 PM

Only someone called DetCord could come up with something like this

I can imagine the conversation with WEPS
What's the explosive power of these things?
845 sir
Hmm, gonna need more
Much more

MadMike · 07-06-17, 01:27 PM

We had nuke's in the very low kiloton range (37 tons and up), mainly artillery fired atomic projectiles. Davy Crockett was about 20 tons. Not my specialty, I worked on strategic and tactical bombs (not to mention explosives and demolitions). Det cord is your friend.

Any one thought of implementing the NT-37 torpedo? It was fielded in 1975, range 19,000 yds, speed 32 knots, warhead 330 lbs HBX. Mk 48's are fine for the 1984 campaign, but I like a little bit of a challenge (lol).

Yours, Mike

Killerfish Games · 07-06-17, 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by caine007

That hill outside Murmansk is SO dead.

I lol'ed at that!

07-05-17, 02:39 PM	#1
DetCord Watch Join Date: Nov 2011 Location: Fort Riley Posts: 18 Downloads: 16 Uploads: 0	It was only a matter of time.... __________________

07-06-17, 01:18 PM	#7
max-peck Grey Wolf Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: UK Posts: 752 Downloads: 393 Uploads: 0	Only someone called DetCord could come up with something like this I can imagine the conversation with WEPS What's the explosive power of these things? 845 sir Hmm, gonna need more *Much* more __________________ -------------------------------------------------- Authority should derive from the consent of the governed, not from the threat of force If the only tool you have is a hammer, pretty soon everything starts to look like a nail FOTRS Ultimate http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=226270 The future of SH4 - coming to a PC near you soon

07-05-17, 03:46 PM	#2
MadMike Watch Officer Join Date: Nov 2002 Posts: 342 Downloads: 232 Uploads: 0	Heh heh. Care to add SUBROC, ASTOR (or even an ASTOR w/conventional warhead)? The Soviets had a full range of nuclear depth bombs, torpedoes, ASM's, SSM's, sub and ship launched rockets, atomic demolitions for Naval Spetsnaz, etc. Yours, Mike

07-05-17, 04:00 PM	#3
tn_prvteye Watch Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 15 Downloads: 108 Uploads: 0	Will I still have to fire 10 of them get a mission success?

07-05-17, 07:07 PM	#5
caine007 A-ganger Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 72 Downloads: 26 Uploads: 0	That hill outside Murmansk is SO dead.

07-06-17, 01:27 PM	#8
MadMike Watch Officer Join Date: Nov 2002 Posts: 342 Downloads: 232 Uploads: 0	We had nuke's in the very low kiloton range (37 tons and up), mainly artillery fired atomic projectiles. Davy Crockett was about 20 tons. Not my specialty, I worked on strategic and tactical bombs (not to mention explosives and demolitions). Det cord is your friend. Any one thought of implementing the NT-37 torpedo? It was fielded in 1975, range 19,000 yds, speed 32 knots, warhead 330 lbs HBX. Mk 48's are fine for the 1984 campaign, but I like a little bit of a challenge (lol). Yours, Mike