SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > Silent Hunter III
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-28-24, 10:45 AM   #1
duce_de_zoop
Swabbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 10
Downloads: 24
Uploads: 0
Default What's worth more - a liner or a cruiser?

Bit of a quandary I had last night.

I was patrolling in my favorite early-war spot, just west of Scapa Flow, when I suddenly a ran into a small task force of a Southampton Class, an auxiliary cruiser, and the HMS Queen of Bermuda ocean liner. Unbelievable luck with 30% fuel left. It was broad daylight, I was directly perpendicular to them, and they were zoomin', so by the time I dived and repositioned I had about a couple minutes to pick a target, grab a solution and fire off my torps.

My great dilemma - I wasn't sure whether I should hit the cruiser or the liner. They were too big, too fast, and too spread out to try to hit both, especially if I had any duds. In the end, I figured I had already sunk a cruiser - an extremely lucky magazine hit on HMS Manchester on my first patrol. So I went with the liner.

My fears were right - one dud, one miss, but two good hits on the bow. I tailed the liner for a bit before it flopped on its nose and sank. Honestly, surprised it only took two. Used my stern tube to take a pot shot at the auxiliary cruiser but missed

Anyway. On the way back I wondered - was that the right move? Like, humor me here, but for the war effort. Should I have sunk the big, juicy ocean liner just cause it looked big and juicy? Or was the cruiser a more practical target? In raw tonnage the liner is certainly bigger, but Wikipedia says it was serving as an auxiliary cruiser in the time I sunk it. Was the Southampton a bigger threat? Did I make the wrong move Kaleuns? What would Donitz think? ;_;
duce_de_zoop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-24, 11:14 AM   #2
Aktungbby
Gefallen Engel U-666
 
Aktungbby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: On a tilted, overheated, overpopulated spinning mudball on Collision course with Andromeda Galaxy
Posts: 28,786
Downloads: 24
Uploads: 0


cool Welcome back, duce_de_zoop!

...sink the liner! Liners were used in WWII as troop-transport because of their high speed capacity to avoid U-boats, and immense capacity to carry thousands of soldiers at a time to various debarcation points for offensives in North Africa and, eventually, the D-day invasion. http://nauticalnotebook.com/jun12-wa...%20sink%20them. ...a primary case in point: https://maritimearchaeologytrust.org...-Burns-WEB.pdf
Quote:
763 American soldiers lost their lives, and 493 bodies were never recovered. 56 of the crew also died,
including the Captain, totalling 819. Survivors were instructed not to divulge details and soldiers were
told that they would lose their GI benefits as civilians if they did so.
News of the sinking was censored at the time, and British documents were classified until 1996.
__________________

"Only two things are infinite; The Universe and human squirrelyness; and I'm not too sure about the Universe"

Last edited by Aktungbby; 05-09-24 at 08:53 AM.
Aktungbby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-24, 03:56 PM   #3
Hooston
Planesman
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 199
Downloads: 15
Uploads: 0
Default Sink 'em all

Onkel Karl would say "be more aggressive". Only in German. Probably.

You have three torpedo tubes, that's one each. They are all pretty helpless against submarines. I think historically Southampton class had a few depth charges for scare effect, and at a pinch could launch its Walrus to depth charge you; so that might be a threat, but I've never seen cruisers attack in game.

The liners and auxiliary cruisers more often than not go down with a single hit and heavy cruisers and large light cruisers seem to also sink very readily with a single hit (which is not really historically correct). In any case if you hit amidships you can always reload and finish them off later. Thanks to the dumb AI the liners and auxiliary cruisers are likely to start zigzagging and may slow down slightly after the first torpedo hits, but they will not use their full speed or change base course. Just shoot them one by one as they go past.
With the type II boat it's usual that I cripple a ship then have to sit there with no torpedoes left. I've waited DAYS in game for ships to sink and a few times have had to wait for the weather to clear so I could use up the flak ammo (to precious little effect). I understand some people like to ram, but I think that's pushing the game a little too far!
No doubt somebody will now chip in with a story about sinking a cruiser or a battleship with the flak gun.
Hooston is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-24, 08:41 AM   #4
Shadowblade
Commander
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 465
Downloads: 12
Uploads: 0
wolf_howl15

the one with more renown
but I guess that ocean liner / troop transport has higher priority - everything which can move troops to Europe should be eliminated.


I would try to get both. When I am not sure, I use magnetic shots to cripple the ship, because immobilised ship is easy prey.
__________________

Kapitänleutnant Vlad von Carstein - U-Flotilla Saltzwedel - U-123, Type IXB



SH3 GWX 3.0

Shadowblade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-24, 10:05 AM   #5
Aktungbby
Gefallen Engel U-666
 
Aktungbby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: On a tilted, overheated, overpopulated spinning mudball on Collision course with Andromeda Galaxy
Posts: 28,786
Downloads: 24
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shadowblade View Post
the one with more renown
but I guess that ocean liner / troop transport has higher priority - everything which can move troops to Europe should be eliminated.


I would try to get both. When I am not sure, I use magnetic shots to cripple the ship, because immobilised ship is easy prey.
Precisely! Liners capable of carrying upwards of 5,000+ troops: ie a division for a D-Day type landing are a strategic target whereas a cruser or carrier is a tactical target. The Queen Mary, Queen Elizabeth, RMS Britannic(Titanic's sister ship-hit a mine in the Agean Sea) and WWI's HMS Lusitania, torpedoed off Ireland, were such. Only the heavy Cruiser USS Indianapolis, transporting the atomic bomb that ended WWII, attains brief strategic status...after which it was tactically sunk on the return voyage with massive loss of life by an IJN submarine.
__________________

"Only two things are infinite; The Universe and human squirrelyness; and I'm not too sure about the Universe"
Aktungbby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-24, 12:15 PM   #6
Bork124
 
Join Date: May 2023
Posts: 2
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
Default

I will attack the escortir first, it so risky when you attack the ocean liner first, the escortir will chase you...but if you rather attack the ocean liner first it will make big renown when RTB😃
Bork124 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-24, 07:31 PM   #7
Shadowblade
Commander
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 465
Downloads: 12
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aktungbby View Post
Precisely! Liners capable of carrying upwards of 5,000+ troops: ie a division for a D-Day type landing are a strategic target whereas a cruser or carrier is a tactical target. The Queen Mary, Queen Elizabeth, RMS Britannic(Titanic's sister ship-hit a mine in the Agean Sea) and WWI's HMS Lusitania, torpedoed off Ireland, were such. Only the heavy Cruiser USS Indianapolis, transporting the atomic bomb that ended WWII, attains brief strategic status...after which it was tactically sunk on the return voyage with massive loss of life by an IJN submarine.

yes, good written
__________________

Kapitänleutnant Vlad von Carstein - U-Flotilla Saltzwedel - U-123, Type IXB



SH3 GWX 3.0

Shadowblade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-24, 01:21 PM   #8
Aktungbby
Gefallen Engel U-666
 
Aktungbby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: On a tilted, overheated, overpopulated spinning mudball on Collision course with Andromeda Galaxy
Posts: 28,786
Downloads: 24
Uploads: 0


Icon9 Case in point: This date in history

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimbuna
5/3/1945 German ocean liner SS Cap Arcona, laden with prisoners is sunk by the Royal Air Force in the western Baltic Sea, killing 5,800. One of the largest maritime losses of life in World War II.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SS_Cap_Arcona
Quote:
Cap Arcona's final use was as a prison ship. In May 1945 she was heavily laden with prisoners from Nazi concentration camps when the Royal Air Force bombed her in the western Baltic Sea, killing about 5,000 people; with more than 2,000(7,800??!) further casualties in the sinkings of the accompanying vessels of the prison fleet, Deutschland and Thielbek. This was one of the largest single-incident maritime losses of life in the Second World War. The capsized hulk of Cap Arcona later drifted ashore, and the beached wreck was finally broken up in 1949. For weeks after the attack, bodies of victims washed ashore, where they were collected and buried in mass graves at Neustadt in Holstein, Scharbeutz and Timmendorfer Strand. Parts of skeletons washed ashore over the next 30 years, with the last find in 1971.
The prisoners aboard the ships were of at least 30 nationalities: American, Belarusian, Belgian, Canadian, Czechoslovakian, Danish, Dutch, Estonian, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hungarian, Italian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Luxembourger, Norwegian, Polish, Romanian, Russian, Serbian, Spanish, Swiss, Ukrainian, and possibly others.
__________________

"Only two things are infinite; The Universe and human squirrelyness; and I'm not too sure about the Universe"
Aktungbby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-24, 09:49 AM   #9
Aktungbby
Gefallen Engel U-666
 
Aktungbby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: On a tilted, overheated, overpopulated spinning mudball on Collision course with Andromeda Galaxy
Posts: 28,786
Downloads: 24
Uploads: 0


Default Welcome aboard!

Bork124!
__________________

"Only two things are infinite; The Universe and human squirrelyness; and I'm not too sure about the Universe"
Aktungbby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-24, 01:11 PM   #10
iambecomelife
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,635
Downloads: 297
Uploads: 0


Default

I would say that large liners should be a good deal more valuable than big cruisers.

Also, IMHO big cruisers were perhaps the most overrated WWII ships:

-almost as crew-intensive as some old battleships, but much less firepower (for example, 1230 crew for USS Portland vs 1450 crew for USS Idaho)

-On a related note, expose a large number of crew to danger - see the death toll on "Sydney", "Indianapolis", "Haguro" etc.

-Almost no ASW capability

-Poor rate of fire for most 8" guns and some 6"guns (until the "Baltimore" class & other late war ships)

-Not as expendable as destroyers

Pretty telling that destroyers and similar ships have dominated post WWII navies, whereas very few big cruisers have been built.
iambecomelife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-24, 01:40 PM   #11
Hooston
Planesman
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 199
Downloads: 15
Uploads: 0
Default Cruisers have been renamed

Cruisers were built for long range patrol in big oceans in the pre-war world. Their large size gave them the required range and also meant they could get close to their design speed in rough weather. They carried aircraft, allowing them to cover more ocean than a destroyer flotilla. In the days before compact centimetric radar a cruiser also had huge advantages in terms of fire control.
Agreed that the "10000 ton" cruiser was more a result of treaty limits than actual usefulness. A main armament with no AA capability plus a secondary armament divided into port and starboard batteries was not efficient.

In actual wartime engagements destroyers gave much more bang for your buck overall but still fared very badly up against "proper" cruisers in daylight. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle..._Bay_of_Biscay for example.

A modern frigate is the size of a small ww2 cruiser, whilst a modern destroyer is pushing 10000 tons displacement again. They also have oceanic range. Crew sizes have come down thanks to automation of armament but are still above a WW2 destroyer.
Hooston is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-24, 03:19 PM   #12
bstanko6
Admiral
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Murwik Naval Academy
Posts: 2,129
Downloads: 390
Uploads: 13


Default

Be sure it isn’t carrying civilians!
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
BSTANKO6'S SH5 NAVAL ACADEMY
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCPbe...W2NArCA/videos

DISCORD
https://discord.gg/6tFeTSUmVc
bstanko6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-24, 06:19 PM   #13
Shadowblade
Commander
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 465
Downloads: 12
Uploads: 0
Default

cruisers - overrated or not - they are always nice target.


Not sure about attacking lonely destroyers (low tonnage and renown), but cruiser is really worthy target for sure.
__________________

Kapitänleutnant Vlad von Carstein - U-Flotilla Saltzwedel - U-123, Type IXB



SH3 GWX 3.0

Shadowblade is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2024 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.