SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > SH5 Mods Workshop
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-28-21, 06:37 PM   #46
Mister_M
Grey Wolf
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 859
Downloads: 27
Uploads: 0


Default

Nice work gap. Very few ships are painted all grey. But something is interesting : it seems that buff superstructures are part of the camouflage system. Indeed, look at the tanker British Genius : original funnel colors are not buff. Maybe it was because grey paint was in short supply, and they used buff paint to do the rest... Another fun fact : the hull has a camo pattern.

Else, the Ellerman's Hall Line seems to have decided to repaint all funnels in orange...
Mister_M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-21, 07:26 PM   #47
gap
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: CJ8937
Posts: 8,215
Downloads: 793
Uploads: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mister_M View Post
Nice work gap. Very few ships are painted all grey. But something is interesting : it seems that buff superstructures are part of the camouflage system. Indeed, look at the tanker British Genius : original funnel colors are not buff.
Definitely. This is in confirmation of kapuhy's findings

Quote:
Originally Posted by kapuhy View Post
- Early war British regulations were supposedly different:
"black hulls and funnels, with brown or dark buff superstructure, masts and derricks"
vs later in the war:
"dark grey hull and funnel, with brown or dark buff as above"
and by 1943:
"By 1943 Allied shipping was pretty standardised on all over grey. However the exact shade could vary depending on what was available. Where possible many still used dark grey hull and lighter upper works."
Black or grey hulls with buff upperworks are dominant in this particular convoy, but apparently there was a certain level of discretionality on how to combine the recommended colours. An interesting variation on the theme are bicolor hulls: black to light grey near the waterline and bluff on top.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mister_M View Post
Maybe it was because grey paint was in short supply, and they used buff paint to do the rest... Another fun fact : the hull has a camo pattern.
mmm... I am not sure about the camo patterrn, those sketches are way too small for us to appreciate such a fine details, but have you noticed the neutrality markings near the bows of the two Swedish freighters (Suecia and Lima)?

Here are a few pictures for visual reference:

 









I think similar markings are also visible on the hull of Kors Holm in the drawings of the 1941 Convoy that you have studied.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mister_M View Post
Else, the Ellerman's Hall Line seems to have decided to repaint all funnels in orange...
Yes, those orange funnels really puzzled me. Orange is definitely not what you would call a "dull" colour, but maybe they are just bluff with some colored bands, and they look orange because of the poor resolution
__________________
_____________________
|May the Force be with you!|
...\/
gap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-21, 09:36 PM   #48
Aktungbby
Gefallen Engel U-666
 
Aktungbby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: On a tilted, overheated, overpopulated spinning mudball on Collision course with Andromeda Galaxy
Posts: 28,786
Downloads: 24
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gap
mmm... I am not sure about the camo patterrn, those sketches are way too small for us to appreciate such a fine details, but have you noticed the neutrality markings near the bows of the two Swedish freighters (Suecia and Lima)?
FAT lotta good it did them: https://www.konditori100.se/SiWW2/sww2lscs.htm
Quote:
During World War II Swedish ships sailed for Sweden, the Allies, the Germans, the Red Cross and for some others.
Swedish merchant sailors memorialAround 1,400-1,500 Swedish sailors were killed when Swedish ships were hit by bombs, grenades, mines and/or torpedoes. (Plus or minus some hundreds - I've seen various numbers.)
500-600 Swedish sailors were killed on ships from other nations.
Around 270 Swedish ships were sunk.
__________________

"Only two things are infinite; The Universe and human squirrelyness; and I'm not too sure about the Universe"
Aktungbby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-21, 08:44 AM   #49
Mister_M
Grey Wolf
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 859
Downloads: 27
Uploads: 0


Default

Why wearing neutrality marks while sailing into an allied convoy ?
Mister_M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-21, 08:48 AM   #50
kapuhy
Grey Wolf
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Poland
Posts: 874
Downloads: 72
Uploads: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mister_M View Post
Why wearing neutrality marks while sailing into an allied convoy ?
Possibly because you do not intend to stay in the convoy for entire cruise and don't want to have to paint them back on when you separate from it. Plus, there's a small chance that given two equally juicy targets in the periscope, U-Boat will select one that belongs to the enemy nation.
kapuhy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-21, 10:40 AM   #51
gap
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: CJ8937
Posts: 8,215
Downloads: 793
Uploads: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aktungbby View Post
Nice link, well done Aktungbby

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mister_M View Post
Why wearing neutrality marks while sailing into an allied convoy ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by kapuhy View Post
Possibly because you do not intend to stay in the convoy for entire cruise and don't want to have to paint them back on when you separate from it. Plus, there's a small chance that given two equally juicy targets in the periscope, U-Boat will select one that belongs to the enemy nation.
Makes sense. We should see the Swedish merchant fleet as a "mercenary fleet" of some sort. They sailed equallity to neutral, Allied and Axis ports, but they couldn't repaint their ships their ships every time they changed destinations. The best way to set up similar nations in game, is having two rosters for each of them, one neutral and the other allied. Ships belonging to the two rosters should be visually identical, but campaign files should call neutral ships to sail to/from neutral or Axis ports, whereas the "enemy" ones should be used within Allied shipping boud to/from England, USA, Canada, USSR, etc.
Probably Vecko has already done something similar for TWoS.
__________________
_____________________
|May the Force be with you!|
...\/
gap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-21, 11:30 AM   #52
kapuhy
Grey Wolf
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Poland
Posts: 874
Downloads: 72
Uploads: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gap View Post
Probably Vecko has already done something similar for TWoS.
That's exactly what "Free XXX" nations are used for.
kapuhy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-21, 09:53 PM   #53
gap
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: CJ8937
Posts: 8,215
Downloads: 793
Uploads: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kapuhy View Post
That's exactly what "Free XXX" nations are used for.
Yes indeed, I know that. I am the one who reworked DesSides.cfg for Open Horizons II back in 2011, when Zedi was still in charge of the mod. With little changes the file is now part of TWoS; I think my exaplanatory notes are still in place btw.

When I created the "Free" nations I had exactly those "ambiguous" diplomatic stances in mind. Nonetheless, more recently, I came to realize that the said nations were poorly implemented in game, or not used at all. I will give you an example. The FreeAmerican nation was created for allowing the implementation of Neutrality Patrols, but I think they were never actually added to the campaign. IIRC, the last time I checked the FreeAmerican roster it was empty.

Several months ago I discussed the topic with Vecko, and I think that the shortcomings were amended at least in part. I say "at least in part" because the last time I offered to cooperate with him on those aspects of the OHII/TWoS campaign he gently refused my proposal, and then he came up with his own changes, so now I am unsure on which features were implemented according to my original idea and which not.

I hope I made myself clearer now
__________________
_____________________
|May the Force be with you!|
...\/
gap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-21, 01:48 AM   #54
Mister_M
Grey Wolf
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 859
Downloads: 27
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gap View Post
I will give you an example. The FreeAmerican nation was created for allowing the implementation of Neutrality Patrols, but I think they were never actually added to the campaign. IIRC, the last time I checked the FreeAmerican roster it was empty.
Ooooh, ok ! So, despite USA being neutral until Dec 1941, some american escort ships or airplanes could attack us ? (but maybe without bombs and depth charges... )
Mister_M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-21, 05:52 AM   #55
kapuhy
Grey Wolf
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Poland
Posts: 874
Downloads: 72
Uploads: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gap View Post
I hope I made myself clearer now
Yes, sorry for my Captain Obvious moment. Of all people, you know best what these nations were created for

As for things being not / not fully implemented, the more I look into campaign files the more I see how much it could be still improved regarding historical accuracy. A pity there's not nearly enough modders interested in SH5 to do it all.
kapuhy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-21, 10:58 AM   #56
gap
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: CJ8937
Posts: 8,215
Downloads: 793
Uploads: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kapuhy View Post
Yes, sorry for my Captain Obvious moment. Of all people, you know best what these nations were created for
No need to say sorry kapuhy!
I hope my previous post didn't sound polemic because that was not my intention

Quote:
Originally Posted by kapuhy View Post
As for things being not / not fully implemented, the more I look into campaign files the more I see how much it could be still improved regarding historical accuracy. A pity there's not nearly enough modders interested in SH5 to do it all.
If Vecko or anyone else is still interested in further improving the TWoS campaign with a focus on historical accuracy, I am on it too

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mister_M View Post
Ooooh, ok ! So, despite USA being neutral until Dec 1941, some american escort ships or airplanes could attack us ? (but maybe without bombs and depth charges... )
I am preparing a long post on this subject that you might finde interesting
__________________
_____________________
|May the Force be with you!|
...\/
gap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-21, 11:03 AM   #57
U-190
Duplicate account

Not Allowed
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Russian Federation Nizhny Novgorod
Posts: 713
Downloads: 2338
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gap View Post
No need to say sorry kapuhy!
I hope my previous post didn't sound polemic because that was not my intention



If Vecko or anyone else is still interested in further improving the TWoS campaign with a focus on historical accuracy, I am on it too



I am preparing a long post on this subject that you might finde interesting
U-190 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-21, 04:31 PM   #58
Mister_M
Grey Wolf
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 859
Downloads: 27
Uploads: 0


Default

Why not set the USA in allied side sooner, as you did first (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/sho...&postcount=398), it's a good idea, and no need to add additional (virtual) free country :

Code:
[SideEntry 5]
Country=American
Side=1
StartDate=19410410	; First naval engagement between an U-boat and the destroyer USS Niblack; USA formally joined the conflict several months later, on 19411208
EndDate=19450901

Last edited by Mister_M; 10-31-21 at 04:52 PM.
Mister_M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-21, 11:30 PM   #59
iambecomelife
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,635
Downloads: 297
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kapuhy View Post
Stumbled upon this thread covering the same topic as well:

http://theminiaturespage.com/boards/msg.mv?id=152218

Some interesting information from there:
- Early war British regulations were supposedly different:
"black hulls and funnels, with brown or dark buff superstructure, masts and derricks"
vs later in the war:
"dark grey hull and funnel, with brown or dark buff as above"
and by 1943:
"By 1943 Allied shipping was pretty standardised on all over grey. However the exact shade could vary depending on what was available. Where possible many still used dark grey hull and lighter upper works."

- availability of specific paints was a problem especially if ships were spread over many ports, so it wouldn't be unusual to have convoy consist of varied paint schemes. Still, general rule was to paint everything in dull colours.

-on varnished wood:
"many of the older ships had varnished brown derricks and masts, and this was often retained as the dull colour was considered sufficient"

- decks and upper surfaces were painted in dullest possible colours by ships approaching European waters, because of widespread fear of being bombed by Condor aircraft. This was done outside of regulations, often at sea with any paints on hand so shades would vary depending on what paints were available.
This is very useful to me! Somehow I missed it; this explains why the tankers in the commodore's sketches had that weird superstructure color - I knew it was the wrong color for ships of British Tanker Co., etc.

Perhaps the admiralty hoped that at a distance enemy vessels would be unsure of whether or not a ship spotted in daylight was neutral or not - as opposed to full camo, which would often be visible anyway and would give away a ship as probably British. This would probably be the best choice without painting on fake neutral hull flags/funnel colors, which would have caused protest from neutral nations....

Interesting photos of colored sketches below, showing how ship camouflage changed from WWI - they are of the standard "War" class merchantman "War Drake" in 1918 and the long bridge deck merchant "Clearpool".

It seems they decided in WW2 that the complicated dazzle camouflage was not very effective.

In peacetime "Clearpool" would have had green funnel with a checkered red emblem, grey-green or bright green hull, huge "billboard" lettering on the hull, and brown+white deckhouses (like "Danby" from the same company):













Last edited by iambecomelife; 11-03-21 at 02:00 AM.
iambecomelife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-21, 01:43 AM   #60
iambecomelife
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,635
Downloads: 297
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kapuhy View Post
Possibly because you do not intend to stay in the convoy for entire cruise and don't want to have to paint them back on when you separate from it. Plus, there's a small chance that given two equally juicy targets in the periscope, U-Boat will select one that belongs to the enemy nation.
Yep - that's correct. I read a book called "Night of the U-Boats" that talked about the problem created by mixed nationality convoys - the author says UK sailors hated neutral ships; the giant flags & bright colors could give away a convoy's location. In HX-79 British tanker "Sitala" was sailing near the neutral Swedish tanker "Janus" on a moonlit night - both got sunk because the bright paint on "Janus" helped submarines find their convoy:

https://www.uboat.net/allies/merchants/ship/641.html

https://www.uboat.net/allies/merchants/ship/638.html
iambecomelife is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2024 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.