How sad

TDK1044 · 02-04-15, 01:24 PM

Hi Guys,

I'm a big fan of the Silent Hunter series. I used to sail these Subsim waters a lot, and interact with Neal, Dan and the guys. The SHIII days were great fun. Yesterday I found out about SH Online, so I went to check it out. What a total disaster. I'd rather have got Ebola. I'm not sure who the game is aimed at. It's an insult to a sub simmer and of little or no interest to a gamer. Maybe one day we'll get the WWII subsim we've always dreamed of.

Hi to my chums here.

utops · 02-04-15, 01:39 PM

Yeah right.

Because subsims should be developed and managed by subsimers and game by gamers.
Not suits with marketing and managment degree.

Cybermat47 · 02-04-15, 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TDK1044

Yesterday I found out about SH Online, so I went to check it out. What a total disaster. I'd rather have got Ebola.

You can stop playing Silent Hunter Online any time you want.

At least 9000 people have already died from Ebola.

Sounds to me like Silent Hunter Online is preferable to having a fatal disease.

CybrSlydr · 02-04-15, 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cybermat47

You can stop playing Silent Hunter Online any time you want.

At least 9000 people have already died from Ebola.

Sounds to me like Silent Hunter Online is preferable to having a fatal disease.

Ebola is only about 50% fatal.

Cybermat47 · 02-04-15, 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CybrSlydr

Ebola is only about 50% fatal.

Silent Hunter Online is 49% fatal, so it's still better.

CybrSlydr · 02-04-15, 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cybermat47

Silent Hunter Online is 49% fatal, so it's still better.

I wish there was a +1. lmfao

Red Devil · 10-16-15, 05:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cybermat47

You can stop playing Silent Hunter Online any time you want.

At least 9000 people have already died from Ebola.

Sounds to me like Silent Hunter Online is preferable to having a fatal disease.

Dont be too hard. Each to their own. There are at least a trillion games out there I would not touch with the proverbial barge pole. I do not play online against humans, but I do play a couple in Steam (Age of Empires 2 HD, for example). New games are rapidly vanishing in the shops for PCs. MY local Asda had hundreds at one stage, now its zero. They sell games for consoles, but I dont, and never will, use them.

So, as a result, I stopped looking. I have my favs, and stay there. SH4 included.

ReallyDedPoet · 02-04-15, 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TDK1044

Hi to my chums here.

Hi Terry

I played SH Online for about 30min, have not touched it
since.

TDK1044 · 02-05-15, 05:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ReallyDedPoet

Hi Terry

I played SH Online for about 30min, have not touched it
since.

Good to see the old timers still here.

I really don't get SH Online. I felt like I was piloting an underwater Drone. To each his own I guess.

Hitman · 02-06-15, 05:46 PM

Hey mate, long not seen you

Do not agree about Ebola

But completely agree about SHO

TDK1044 · 02-08-15, 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hitman

Hey mate, long not seen you

Do not agree about Ebola

But completely agree about SHO

I don't get the concept of SHO......or the demographic for that matter. I think that there should be a Drone war game though

GoldenRivet · 02-12-15, 01:40 AM

The concept of SHO is simple, The silent hunter series we have spent decades growing to love has evolved into what most PC games are evolving into... an attempt to fool you into thinking it is free so they can get you to perpetually pay for it for as long as you continue to play it.

several of the "world of ___ " games come to mind.

In the good old days we used to shell out $60 for a good PC game... now you just download it for free, there is enough action and playability to draw your interest so that you will part with the 99 cents to reload a torpedo or 25 cents to refill your fuel or $1.00 for the next submarine version.

or you can play for free all the way and wait 3 days for fuel to regenerate, or 6 weeks for a new sub type - whatever, the numbers im mentioning are completely hypothetical because i have no idea what the real numbers are, but the point is the same

on a long enough time line, you have paid many times over your $60 to play a game, which in my opinion, is not as enjoyable as its predecessors to start with.

I have read the good the bad and the ugly about SHO from the very moment it was announced to the world.

based on the merits of my observations and reading of the experiences of others, i have decided not to waste one second of my limited time on this earth fooling with it.

02-04-15, 01:24 PM	#1
TDK1044 Ocean Warrior Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Georgia, USA Posts: 2,674 Downloads: 25 Uploads: 0	How sad Hi Guys, I'm a big fan of the Silent Hunter series. I used to sail these Subsim waters a lot, and interact with Neal, Dan and the guys. The SHIII days were great fun. Yesterday I found out about SH Online, so I went to check it out. What a total disaster. I'd rather have got Ebola. I'm not sure who the game is aimed at. It's an insult to a sub simmer and of little or no interest to a gamer. Maybe one day we'll get the WWII subsim we've always dreamed of. Hi to my chums here.

02-06-15, 05:46 PM	#10
Hitman Pacific Aces Dev Team Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Spain Posts: 6,102 Downloads: 109 Uploads: 2	Hey mate, long not seen you Do not agree about Ebola But completely agree about SHO __________________ One day I will return to sea ...

02-12-15, 01:40 AM	#12
GoldenRivet Subsim Aviator Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Texas Posts: 8,724 Downloads: 146 Uploads: 0	The concept of SHO is simple, The silent hunter series we have spent decades growing to love has evolved into what most PC games are evolving into... an attempt to fool you into thinking it is free so they can get you to perpetually pay for it for as long as you continue to play it. several of the "world of ___ " games come to mind. In the good old days we used to shell out $60 for a good PC game... now you just download it for free, there is enough action and playability to draw your interest so that you will part with the 99 cents to reload a torpedo or 25 cents to refill your fuel or $1.00 for the next submarine version. or you can play for free all the way and wait 3 days for fuel to regenerate, or 6 weeks for a new sub type - whatever, the numbers im mentioning are completely hypothetical because i have no idea what the real numbers are, but the point is the same on a long enough time line, you have paid many times over your $60 to play a game, which in my opinion, is not as enjoyable as its predecessors to start with. I have read the good the bad and the ugly about SHO from the very moment it was announced to the world. based on the merits of my observations and reading of the experiences of others, i have decided not to waste one second of my limited time on this earth fooling with it. __________________

02-04-15, 01:39 PM	#2
utops Planesman Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Gdańsk,Poland Posts: 197 Downloads: 202 Uploads: 0	Yeah right. Because subsims should be developed and managed by subsimers and game by gamers. Not suits with marketing and managment degree.