Quote:
Originally Posted by CCIP
Leaving race aside for a second too, let's also compare this to Tsarnaev who was widely called a terrorist from the very start, although aside from his brother, no link has been proven between him and any organized terror - just some twisted ideas. I don't remember there being much public debate on whether Tsarnaev was a terrorist or not - only his lawyers seemed to be seriously convinced that he wasn't. That said, I doubt this guy's fate will be much different from Tsarnaev's - and given that it's SC and not MA, the death penalty will likely be brought out with far less hesitation, too.
|
Theory on how this works
vis a vis Tsarnaev.
If mass shootings are to be considered terrorism, they are then so common in the US so that no politician can make a case for keeping people safe.
If they are not terrorism, then we haven't failed to prevent terrorism.
Ergo this.
Not that I sign up to that logic, quite the opposite.