View Single Post
Old 07-07-12, 04:12 AM   #42
Skybird
Soaring
 
Skybird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: the mental asylum named Germany
Posts: 40,501
Downloads: 9
Uploads: 0


Default

Islam is a fundamentalist and aggressive ideology by core. The mainstream Islam is not the often so perceived "moderate" "peaceful" Islam - this is only a minority worldwide. The hardcore Islam, based on sharia and enforcing it'S law in all world - that is the mainstrema Islam if you ask people and poipulations in Muslim countries: they form the majority, and right so (in the menaing of that this is what Quran and Sharia are about). The abberation from Islam are not the so-called fundamenmtalists or "Islamists" (that is diölomats word invention based on an attempt by Saudi Arabia to gloiss over its own barbaric extremism), the abberation is that minority of Muslims that may indeed (or not) talk on behalf of moderation, tolerance and peace. And a huge part of them her ein the West still dop nto openly take a stance against those in their middle that are "radical", but silenty tolerate them and thus help them by indirectly supporting their cause).

The war in afghanistan and Iraq took place without a formal declaration of war, their governments did not recieve such a docuem,nt, or am I wrong? But by what is being done, they are/were wars - undeclared wars, if you want to be picky, but still: wars. The war on terror is a stupid phrase, since it seem to express that one wages war against a tool (terror). But you don'T. Yiou wage war against those using the tool. Which are those people being motivated by the message of Quran and the demand for Shariah law everywhere. Thus the ideology that motivates them to do so, is the enemy. And that's why I said the war on terror better should be understood as a war on Islam.

Whether you agree to that or not, is not important anymore, since facts already have been created by Islam itself: it is waging war against all non-Muslim mankind since the days of Muhammad. There is no peace where there is no Islamic rule, that's the logic by which it operates. Both peace and freedom, civil rights anyway, are subordinate to Shariah law, and Quran. What freedom and what peace is, gets defined by Shariah and Quran. That'S why Islam does not accept and is incompatible with Western law coders and constitutions plus the values expressed in them.

If you do not believe me that the understanding of terms is totally different in Islam and non-Islam, compare, paragraph by paragraph, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights , and the Cairo Declaration of Human Rights in Islam. An abyss will open before your eyes. They are LIGHTYEARS apart, and totally incompatible. The Islamic Human Rights Declaration can only be had at the price of totally destroying the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert.
Skybird is offline   Reply With Quote