View Single Post
Old 06-24-22, 11:45 AM   #3512
Rockstar
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Zendia Bar & Grill
Posts: 11,849
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moonlight View Post
A Regressive Supreme Court Judgement.

6 males voting on this Wade v Roe abortion law, sounds fair by American standards, next thing they'll do is turn a black criminal into a national hero...... whaaat!, they already have.

If you yank women (womb walkers) are going to let 6 male judges tell you what you can and can't do with your bodies then it's more fool you time.
Roe v Wade has absolutely nothing to do with protecting a women’s right. It has EVERYTHING to do with protecting abortion providers right to practice. Not only that but if this idiot democrat talking below was telling even a kernel of truth it seems they’re more interested in harvesting bodies..



Maybe instead acting like a bunch of liberal terrorists and butchers. They can start work towards actually giving a sheet about the woman and infants instead of protecting male abortion providers right to harvest bodies in the name of science and money.

https://www.law.uchicago.edu/news/ju...w-school-visit

Quote:
“My criticism of Roe is that it seemed to have stopped the momentum on the side of change,” Ginsburg said. She would’ve preferred that abortion rights be secured more gradually, in a process that included state legislatures and the courts, she added. Ginsburg also was troubled that the focus on Roe was on a right to privacy, rather than women’s rights.

“Roe isn’t really about the woman’s choice, is it?” Ginsburg said. “It’s about the doctor’s freedom to practice…it wasn’t woman-centered, it was physician-centered.”
__________________
Guardian of the honey and nuts


Let's assume I'm right, it'll save time.
Rockstar is offline   Reply With Quote