Quote:
Originally Posted by Moonlight
A Regressive Supreme Court Judgement.
6 males voting on this Wade v Roe abortion law, sounds fair by American standards, next thing they'll do is turn a black criminal into a national hero...... whaaat!, they already have.
If you yank women (womb walkers) are going to let 6 male judges tell you what you can and can't do with your bodies then it's more fool you time.
|
Roe v Wade has absolutely nothing to do with protecting a women’s right. It has EVERYTHING to do with protecting abortion providers right to practice. Not only that but if this idiot democrat talking below was telling even a kernel of truth it seems they’re more interested in harvesting bodies..
Maybe instead acting like a bunch of liberal terrorists and butchers. They can start work towards actually giving a sheet about the woman and infants instead of protecting male abortion providers right to harvest bodies in the name of science and money.
https://www.law.uchicago.edu/news/ju...w-school-visit
Quote:
“My criticism of Roe is that it seemed to have stopped the momentum on the side of change,” Ginsburg said. She would’ve preferred that abortion rights be secured more gradually, in a process that included state legislatures and the courts, she added. Ginsburg also was troubled that the focus on Roe was on a right to privacy, rather than women’s rights.
“Roe isn’t really about the woman’s choice, is it?” Ginsburg said. “It’s about the doctor’s freedom to practice…it wasn’t woman-centered, it was physician-centered.”
|
__________________
Guardian of the honey and nuts
Let's assume I'm right, it'll save time.