[propbeanie]

One more attempt at clarification: Your mod list looks fine, so we know it is not something interfering with the modded game. We thank you all very much for pointing things out, but "No" and "Bad" tell us absolutely nothing. What is "No" and "Bad" in the picture? The sub hull? The decking? The "skinning"? The color? The fact that there are no bikini-clad girls on deck? To say something needs improving is one thing, but please describe in which manner it could be improved upon. Saying there is troubles with the flag is fine, but what is the trouble? Is it too high? Upside down? at half mast? We finally figured out what you were talking about, in that the Cachalot had an extra flag node in the eqp file, and the flag was still showing when you had applied the NoPlayerSubFlag mod. That is hopefully fixed in the Patch, and we do appreciate your pointing it out Kal_Maximus_U669. If you downloaded the patch prior to roughly five hours ago, the link was pointing to an incorrect file, which has been rectified, and you can try to do it again.

As for "patches" - there are not that many mods out there that do not have patches. TMO, RFB and RSRDC are three that spring immediately to mind, being SH4 mods. Just the sheer size of a mod makes it next to impossible to fully test prior to release. We're amateurs and not to the level of the game's devs... oh wait... they had patches too, didn't they? As an aside, more work has already been done on the Cachalot. However, what is wrong or incorrect where the "No" and "Bad" are pointing to? We're not "sharks", have not played one, but did stay at a Holiday Inn Express about six months ago, so that should qualify us to act like one...