View Single Post
Old 03-26-23, 04:30 PM   #5430
Rockstar
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Zendia Bar & Grill
Posts: 11,746
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buddahaid View Post
Well there you go. What amounts to prurient is, ah, in the eyes of the beholder.

Of course, banning and censoring wouldn't cause any increased interest at all. LOL

The law is in regard to school libraries and allows for the school board, local community and parents to work out. The federal court in California, the governing view of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is found in Ripplinger v. Collins, 868 F.2d 1043 (1989):

“The average person would probably find that most hard-core pornography has little effect on him, and it may well disgust him. Or he may find that it is so overdone as to have anything but a stimulative effect. It is apparent that neither the Supreme Court nor the legislatures intended that tasteful pornography be suppressed while distasteful pornography remains unregulated. Rather, the emphasis must be on the intent or aim of the publication as a whole. If this aim is to produce psychic or physical stimulation, on a less than intellectual plane, and on a short-term basis, then the prurient-interest aspect of the test for obscenity has been met.”

But relax and keep fapping on, nobody is gonna take your porn away from you. You just aren’’t gonna find it in the school library here in the U.S. But like I said earlier, I don’t know of any school library that has ever allowed such things.

But now you never know with those pervs in Europe the way they’re ranting on and mocking the U.S. courts definition of pornography & Utah’s law. It seems they like showing porn to little children, it’s so progressive you know.
__________________
Guardian of the honey and nuts


Let's assume I'm right, it'll save time.

Last edited by Rockstar; 03-26-23 at 04:53 PM.
Rockstar is offline   Reply With Quote