View Single Post
Old 12-11-23, 06:23 AM   #212
Skybird
Soaring
 
Skybird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: the mental asylum named Germany
Posts: 40,554
Downloads: 9
Uploads: 0


Default

Click on "Ich unterstütze bereits" to pass. Its just a harmless support request.

https://www-tichyseinblick-de.transl..._x_tr_pto=wapp

Quote:
At the time, climate researcher Rahmstorf formulated the sentence that “we” had lost control over the climate. That leaves you perplexed. When have humans ever had control over the climate, primarily over the weather? This remark was probably an expression of his dream of ever being able to do it. All power to the climate researchers from the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK).
The “Mass” can also be interpreted as a religious perspective. Believers meet here to strengthen their faith and not allow any doubts. It is important to blame the Old World, which has already emitted (too) much in its history. With the regularity of the chimes of a church tower bell, the urgency is emphasized before each COP. If the breakthrough doesn't happen this time, we'll be irredeemably lost, then the big glow will come and so on. It's always 5 to 12, the clock must have stopped somehow. Currently the weather in Europe argues against warming, but explanations are being offered: the snow is warmer than it used to be, it's colder because it's getting warmer, and it's the warmest cold snap in 125,000 years - or something like that.
A neverending source of reasons for mockery and laughter. I stick to my old view of all this: in general it seems to get warmer for sure, but we will not prevent that, and so have to adapt to a warmer world in a meaning of evolutionary theory. Wanting to turn he clocks back like the Greens want, will not save us, neither will a hysterical witch hunt against technology. Climate science is, like nutrition science, a hotspot of corruption in science. The intention is not so much saving the climate, but "marxistically" redistributing wealth from the haves to the havenots, and to keep the rabble in a never-ending scare in order to be able to drive them more easily in the desired radical left direction. Not to mention that many a stupid monkey would look pretty hilarious if he were to admit now that he has spent his academic career spreading nothing but drivel, so that he can have absolutely no self-interest in helping to form this enlightening historical moment of ending this nonsense. And all the activist organizations and their babbling figureheads would also have to weep bitter tears after their sudden loss of significance and donations. Life is not fair!
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert.
Skybird is offline   Reply With Quote