Quote:
Originally Posted by Neal Stevens
My 2 cents: Ubisoft put their backs into SH3 and SH4, and were on the way with SH5 before their resources were exhausted before completion. Say what you will about them, they gave us the best WWII submarine simulations, really the only WWII subsims, since 1997.
Making a high fidelity simulation that will please just a fraction of the high demands and expectations of the customers is resource intensive, and that means expensive. When the sales don't add up to a profit, well, there's no business in losing money.
|
It's the "best" WW2 subsim because it's basically the only one around. There are nothing out there that you can compare with SH other than another SH.
And it is speaking volume when next to nobody compares the newer SHs favorably to the older ones.