View Single Post
Old 12-01-22, 04:48 PM   #12
HunterICX
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Malaga, España
Posts: 10,750
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Threadfin View Post
I skipped the remaster. Rome 1 was a great game in its day, and I'm sure the remaster made improvements, but the release was troubled, they rather botched it, and then went back to the drawing board and I suspect its better now. Mods muddle the equation and can overcome the worst parts and make it a better game.

But it's still ancient Rome, and I like Rome 2.

Having played it lots at release I can't recall it being botched.
outside the claims it was botched because any Windows version before Wind 10 wasn't being supported.
They didn't go back on that one and Win10 is still a requirement.


the UI got some complaints but that's a "personal" things I'd find. I'm indifferent about that. Doesn't look better or worse then the original..but again that's a personal opinion.


It made improvements and also made those improvements optional if you wish to play it like it was with the original.


For me the upgrade to remaster was just 10€ because I already owned the original on Steam. A fair price to get the game to run properly again.
__________________
HunterICX is offline   Reply With Quote