Is that really the best you can do? Pretend the 2018 Legal Agreement does not say what it actually says in plain language and then post irrelevant links to PR material?
I will post again the text to article 7 of the 2018 Legal Agreement:
https://www.obama.org/wp-content/upl...F-NARA-LOI.pdf
The language is black and white and unambiguous. There were classified douments held by the Obama Foundation in the Hoffman Estates in 2018 and the Hoffman Estates was not a NARA-controlled facility that conforms to the agency's archival storage standards for such records.
Now in an objective Court of Law, there is something known as the hierarchy of evidence:
-On the one hand, you have a legal agreement drafted in 2018 which makes it clear that Obama was holding classified documents in potential violation of the presidential Records Act.
-On the other hand you have a "cover your ass" bureaucratic press release written by NARA when it is the middle of a potential political scandal.
The problem with Rabid Anti-Trumpers, like you, is that they are so blinded by their hatred of Trump that they can no longer look at facts objectively. They just latch on to whatever story they think will potentially hurt Trump even though it is as flimsy as a house of cards.
So when the question came up if Trump is being treated differenty from other ex-Presidents, NARA conveniently issues a PR docmunent and all the MSM latched on to it:
"Oh Look, a shiny object! case closed! no need to investigate further!"
Now if these were more normal political times, you might expect journalists to dig a little deeper and ask some simple questions like:
-WHO actually wrote the NARA press release?;
-Was the author of the NARA press release aware of the 2018 Legal Agreement?;
-Can NARA explain the discrepancy between what they are saying now and what was in the 2018 Legal Agreeement?;
So again we are back to the same question as before, why is Trump deing treated differently than Obama?
You can be sure all these questions and more will be asked in 2023 when NARA officials are hauled in front of congressional committees to answer them under oath.