[Buddahaid]

Originally Posted by August

Well Trump wasn't the first one to claim that a presidential election was fixed. Hillery was making that claim way back in 2016 and she continues to maintain it even now. Although you think otherwise, I believe that given her known ruthlessness and proven penchant for dirty tricks she would have gone to much greater lengths than Trump ever did to maintain power, and would likely have had the backing of the administrative state to do it, something which Trump most certainly did not have.

Fair enough, but that will remain a "what if" while with Trump we have history to substantiate his illegal behavior, and so far, that "administrative state" simply amounts to the rule of law as defined by the constitution.

When, and if, the SCOTUS rules against Trump's behavior, will that be "deep state" as well, or simply the execution of separation of powers? Trump has lost effectively every ruling from the courts in this land irrespective of what party the judges were appointed, or elected, from.