Quote:
Originally Posted by Onkel Neal
I'm all for expecting clear evidence to discredit the system but I think in light of recent developments (maybe Wuhan flu from a lab), I wouldn't call the supposition that the election was more fraudulent that before a conspiracy theory.
|
This. When you use administrative procedure to declare evidence (proof positive evidence) inadmissable or that plaintiffs don't have standing, at any other time and place, leftists would be up in arms and declare the court to be right wing and demand the judge recuse.
If the evidence is there, you shouldn't be allowed to suppress it. Let it be admitted and stand on its own or be determined as not believable.