Best of SUBSIM noms - Outstanding Member

[Onkel Neal]

Best of SUBSIM noms - Outstanding Member nominated here.

This is the guy you enjoying talking with in the forums, who is always positive, patient, and upbeat. This is a guy you wouldn't mind being neighbors with.

[Onkel Neal]

Onkel Neal has made a Best of SUBSIM nomination.
Nomination Category:

Outstanding Member

Nomination basis: He is always ready with an interesting topic, keep up the good work.
Forum: General Topics

Nominated Member: em2nought
Nominated Post: Link

I'd probably only use silver in the SHTF ammo, not the practice ammo. :03:

On a different note, I wonder what everyone thinks of this indoor/outdoor heater & cook stove? Might be living in a van during some nasty weather while following those blades around. https://www.mypatriotsupply.com/prod...t-cooking-fuel

[rik007]

rik007 has made a Best of SUBSIM nomination.
Nomination Category:

Outstanding Member

Nomination basis: Fubar is always helping and always availble to do so. Of course he has profound knowledge of Sh3.
Forum: SHIII Mods Workshop

Nominated Member: FUBAR295
Nominated Post: Link

Here is a recent screen shot and it shows railings are there.






You may have a corrupt file maybe?

[GrenSo]

GrenSo has made a Best of SUBSOM nomination.
Category:

Outstanding Member

Post: Fifi fixes reported issues and bugs of its extensive mod for SH3 in a short time.
Forum: SHIII Mods Workshop

Posted by: Fifi
Nominated Post: Link

NYGM IS BACK AND RUNNING!
V5.8 IS OUT NOW!

Best is new clean install, and new career !

- CTD when loading career from 03/41 to 12/41 has been fixed
- Naval Bases present in SCR file have been moved to LND file as it should be (exept U-Milkcow of course)
- Adjustments in plenty harbors (docked ships)
- Salamis available for refueling in Med, but is still not playable German base
- Minors adjustments

Med Air threat has been checked...all air bases are present, and some air patrol around Malta present in the SCR file too.

Have fun :ping:

:Kaleun_Salute:

[Catfish]

Catfish has made a Best of SUBSIM nomination.
Nomination Category:

Outstanding Member

Nomination basis: One of the few sane (and i do not include me!) members, witty and explaining things in a way that is never boring.
Giving good background info on us politicians and their conduct.
Also great information on musicians and their style and techniques.
Forum: General Topics

Nominated Member: vienna
Nominated Post: Link

Trump and his Trumpette lemmings are making a lot of noise about his felony convictions; reminds me of the phrase "Sound and fury signifying nothing" (Thanks, Bill); why nothing?; because, as with the 'stolen election/election fraud' claims, its just noise without any real substance; Trump and his attorneys (who I am sure, given the "reputable" nature of DJT's business history, will be demanding payment upfront) will have their day in court(s), again, to make their appeals to try and keep Trump from being tagged as the felon he really is; a main point to consider is an appeal may be made based on trial procedures, etc, but an appeal cannot re-argue evidence; once a trial is held and a jury has rendered a verdict, the evidence presented is accepted as factual and cannot be contested unless there is some extraordinary occurrence (e.g., in a murder trial, new evidence that is fully exculpatory of the convicted criminal comes to light); but Trump's situation really leaves him with only the possibility of finding some technicality to void the verdict; still, it would not be an acquittal at all and would only mean that the DA could refile for a new trail; so, for Trump, he is guilty of the his crimes and was found so by a jury chosen with his participation and, if there was any exculpatory evidence to be presented, he either chose not to present that evidence or he actually really didn't have a defense for his actions under the law (saying, ad nauseam, "I'm not guilty!!" or "Rigged trial" is not an actual legal defense, its just a loudmouth ranting); he had his chance and he, as the loser he is, blew it...

Now, he probably will try to push his loony bin ideas of how he was 'mistreated' but I doubt if any of them will hold any legal water; as far as the Trumpette lemmings and their ranting, I have one main question:

Can you give any specific, verifiable, and legally justifiable proof or substantiation that the trial was rigged, or the Judge was corrupt or unethical, or the jury was in any way tampered with, or the Biden Administration had any direct or tangential influence or exerted direction in the conduct of the prosecution and/or trial; I want actual provable facts, not op-eds or talking-head, tin-hat rantings from the InterWebs, I want something that has real weight and effect that would have a good chance of standing up in court...


Let's eee if there are any real takers...


I got a bit of a laugh from the claim in a previous posting citing as proof of bias/corruption/etc., the statement by NY DA Bragg that he had sued Trump "hundreds of times"; this is the sort of specious "proof" I'm talking about; yes, Bragg, in his function as DA has sued Trump "hundreds of times", or more precisely, the NY DA's office has sued Trump hundreds of times; So, Bragg actually has sued Trump as he claims, but so have his many predecessors and likely those DAs who will follow; there is no specific bias at play here: Trump is just a sleazy businessman for whom being sued is SOP; Trump, and his businesses in NY, have a very long and colorful history in the NY state courts since Trump has had an astonishing number of complaints and lawsuits filed against him over the decades and has had rather mixed results; although Trump projects the image that his is a "winner" and never settles when it comes to court cases against him, he actually has settled out of court far more often than he has won in court and he has a long, long history of trying to avoid jury trials at any cost (gee, I wonder why?) he has even lost some of the cases brought against him, with the this case, in particular, being interesting...


Paint Shop Owner Juan Carlos Enriquez Took On Trump — and Won -

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...mp-won-n747756



Gotta admire it when a little guy wins over a fat cat...



So, by being stubborn and fighting to avoid paying a USD $32,000 legitimate billing, Trump ended up paying some USD $300,000, instead, yep that Trump is a real astute businessman, someone who should be running a government...


...and, there's this little gem...


$300,000 Arbitration Win, Defeating Trump CampaignÂ’s Efforts to Enforce Arbitration -


https://www.tzlegal.com/our-successe...r-over-300000/



Seems like Donnie just isn't the "winner" he wants us to believe he is...


BTW, although I have many, many very good reasons not to vote for Trump, there is one very big and glaring reason I could never vote for someone like him: Trump had a charity foundation setup and raised funds for a particular charity; there was little notice of the disposition of the funds until a journalist, before the 2016 Presidential Election, got the idea of doing a sort of human interest, 'feel good' piece on those who were to have benefited from the Trump Foundation fundraising; the big problem was, as the journalist contacted the purported recipients, none of them had seen a single cent from the Foundation; further investigation showed none of the funds had been distributed by Trump; in fact, Trump had used the Foundation's funds as a sort of 'petty cash' account, using the fund to pay for personal items like sports memorabilia and a "Yuuge" six-foot portrait painting of himself for his own personal use, among other tchotchkes; the NY State Attorney General's Office filed a lawsuit against the Trump Foundation and forced Trump to own up to his transgressions and doubled the amount he would have had to pay as donated funds to charity, so, again, Trump, by his own stubborn willingness to stand by his criminality, had to fork over far more than he would have had tom pay if he had just acted honestly...

So, I find it extremely repulsive to vote for a man who would, with free will and malice aforethought, steal from a charity; and I find it even even more of a repugnant idea to vote for him with the knowledge that the charity he so cavalierly disrespected and stole from was a veteran's charity; there are low people and there are low people; Trump, much as the worm he is, is absolutely subterranean...




<O>